Posted by William Bronchick on October 20, 2001 at 19:04:34:
In Reply to: legal precedence? really? posted by Bill Gatten on October 20, 2001 at 14:40:28:
I must admit that I was not aware that people were doing their own closings a escrow in other states, so I apologize on that issue (I was going to make a stink about the fact that you were doing closings for out of state deals, but it appears you don't).
As for precedence, it means REPORTED decisions in the law reporters (usually appellate cases) that analyze the law. The argument that "the judge in the last case ruled in my favor" means squat to the judge you are in front of. Unless you show him reported law, he is free to make up his own law as he sees fit (remember the FL Supreme Court in Gore vs. Bush?).
As for complexity, my Mom said (after you spoke) that she hadn't been that confused since she had been a Jack Miller seminar!
- Re: OK, I'll give you this round Bill Gatten 20:11:23 10/22/01 (6)
- STICK TO THE FACTS, CLINTON! William Bronchick 20:42:01 10/22/01 (5)
- HERE ARE THE FACTS...MILHOUSE Bill Gatten 17:34:39 10/23/01 (4)
- It's Joe Friday . . . William Bronchick 18:19:14 10/23/01 (3)
- Its a big city out there Joe (V V) Bill Gatten 14:30:40 10/24/01 (2)
- Re: Its a big city out there Joe (V V) Bronchick 18:14:01 10/24/01 (1)
- Re: big city Bill Gatten 13:46:33 10/25/01 (0)
- That's a beaut... Jim Pasquini 21:52:09 10/20/01 (5)
- Important issues unclear to me William Bronchick 17:43:41 10/22/01 (2)
- It's worth mentioning... Orlando 12:19:45 10/23/01 (0)
- Windex for Bronchick Jim Pasquini 18:58:52 10/22/01 (0)
- Re: That's a beaut... Byron 22:59:19 10/20/01 (1)
- Let me... Jim Pasquini 09:42:23 10/21/01 (0)
NO POST
Name : E-Mail : Subject :
Comments:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ CREOnline News Group ] WWWBoard 2.0a and WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997, All Rights Reserved.
Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company