Posted by Rick, the Probate Guy on February 05, 2010 at 18:33:12:
In Reply to: Re: apples and bananas... posted by james (CA) on February 05, 2010 at 16:29:57:
Nothing so complicated.
The O.P. wished to know which was better: Lease-optioning or subject-to? I stated that they are not mutually exclusive, meaning that you can do both in a given transaction.
As to the Original Post, it's like asking which is better on top your ice cream: chocolate sauce or whipped cream? Huh? Order your desserts just as you like them.
So, One contract between buyer and seller. Negotiate all the terms you want in that One contract. Ask for whipped cream. cherries even a dancing girl to serve it to you.
Be prepared to jettison any part of the terms you can live without.
Better know up front what part of a deal makes it work for you or be prepared to walk. Way too many new folks fall in love with the only deal they know...the one in front of them, as if they'll never see another deal or have an opportunity to negotiate a deal again.
Is someone hyping a lease-option/sub-2 course that's confusing people here? Am I lmissing something?
Usually, I've been told, I have a pretty good command of the obvious.
- Re: apples and bananas... Bill H 18:37:22 02/05/10 (0)